🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions regarding the comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler after the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents American, Fowler is from the US – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Rather, he brought up the ongoing drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, myself included. But come on. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who he has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the next round). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the chance to beat the top three players in the world in succession. He is well justified to aim for the achievement; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier between her and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the global rankings starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six matches over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite serve and powerful power on both forehand and backhand are sufficiently adequate to dispose of most opponents on the professional circuit. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is frequently overmatched. The last several years has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless move around with the surprising speed and grace of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a drop shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite harsh limitation on his potential.

The American has made a several significant, unexpected improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match ought to have been enough of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the very end, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with the American creating plenty of chances to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz eventually did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous game to drop serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to use excessive energy to win it. Down set points in the final game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling evidence that Fritz is not good enough to beat any version of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially seem like he thought he could win. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired enough experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, exceeding almost anyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only say his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a match, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for America failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in the summer of claiming a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is in fact extremely unlikely for everybody else. {